Is there a freedom to go where the scientific evidence leads you or are we forced to accept the evolutionary theory as a fact?|||trust me evolution will never ever be a fact.
God would never have it that way.
Can we be certain that evolution is a myth?
http://christianity.com/ministryaudio/pl鈥?/a>|||Now there's an answer from a real truth-seeker: "trust me evolution will never ever be a fact." OH, it's a matter of TRUST! If I'd known it were so easy I wouldn't have paid any attention to the decades of biological science which shows mountains of evidence to the contrary!
Report Abuse
|||Look, fool, evolution isn't going to BECOME a fact (whatever that means), it IS a fact. Given the choice between the hand-me-down dogma from a world which has believed in thousands of religions and superstitions over the millennia... and science... I'll go with the latter every time.
Report Abuse
|||If either of you care about the truth (and I doubt it) you'll check out Jeff B's link. And since you both seem uneducated in science (which may not be your fault) know that a scientific theory is a set of principles which EXPLAINS a set of facts. It's not a mere guess, as the word is popularly used.
Report Abuse
|||I have 4 degrees in engineering and saw the film. I was rather sad to see Baylor Baptist of all places giving an ID researcher a hard time
Yes, I think the journalist and scientists who were interviewed were not treated propperly. The inventors of the scientific method itself were theists and believed in creation. There is no problem between science and theism... the problem is between atheism and theism.
Interestingly the movie did not mention that Eugenie Scott was a fairly aggressive atheist and many athiests have no problem using science class to undermine the faith of children as long as it's thier humanistic religon that is pushed they allow their religion in schools|||intelligent design is loser talk
those same scientists would stop looking for the cure for cancer and just say "god causes it"
their entire "theory" fails #3 of the scientific method...it makes no future predictions to confirm its validity. its not even pseudo science. its theology.
those scientists that abandon science, should not be allowed to remain in scientific academia.|||I think it brought up a good point.
Not that ID HAS to be accepted across the board. But that the field of science should not be a hard lined organization that encourages group think and ostracizes those that might start some research in a different direction.|||those people arent scientists.
They have no knowledge of the theories they are attacking.
Evolution is fact, I am sorry if you dont understand it, but that doesnt change the fact that it is happening all around us, and to us as well.|||It is a bunch of bollocks, for the real story on the scientists who have supposedly been expelled go to the following links and click on their names.
http://www.expelledexposed.com/index.php鈥?/a>|||In America you are forced in schools to accept evolution as a fact and not question it. In China it is the opposite case. Mistreating atheistic alternative scientists is an old story.|||The movie lied about the scientist's mistreatment. They weren't fired, their careers weren't destroyed, and in some cases they weren't even scientists to begin with.|||I've seen it... and no matter how much they stomp their feet, Intelligent Design isn't science.|||If they have evidence that will stand up to scrutiny, they have no issues. However, we ain't seen none, yet.|||What scientists... are you kidding ? Creation science isn't science, Sweetheart.
No comments:
Post a Comment